Monitors / Comparison

ASUS MX27UC vs Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS MX27UC

27″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 57.0 / 100Good
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Wasabi

Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0

55″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 57.0 / 100Good
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time50
Verdict

ASUS MX27UC and Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 57 and 57.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS MX27UCWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0
57Gear score57
27″Screen size55″
3840×2160Resolution3840×2160
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
IPSPanelIPS
5 msResponse time5 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is ASUS MX27UC or Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 better?

ASUS MX27UC and Wasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 57 and 57.

Similar comparisons

ASUS MX27UC vs ASUS Designo MX27UCSASUS MX27UC vs ASUS Eye Care VY27UQASUS MX27UC vs ASUS PA329QASUS MX27UC vs BenQ EW2780UASUS MX27UC vs BenQ EW2880UWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 vs ASUS Designo MX27UCSWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 vs ASUS Eye Care VY27UQWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 vs BenQ EW2780UWasabi Mango UHD550 REAL 4K HDMI 2.0 vs BenQ EW2880U