ASUS MX34VQ vs LG 40WP95C-W
ASUS MX34VQ
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VALG 40WP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSASUS MX34VQ and LG 40WP95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS MX34VQ leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS MX34VQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS MX34VQ
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
LG 40WP95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MX34VQ | LG 40WP95C-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Gear score | 60 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 39.7″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 5120×2160 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 72 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,400 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MX34VQ or LG 40WP95C-W better?
ASUS MX34VQ and LG 40WP95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60. Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS MX34VQ leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: ASUS MX34VQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS MX34VQ leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).