ASUS PA328Q vs Philips 498P9
ASUS PA328Q
32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSPhilips 498P9
48.8″ · 5120×1440 · 70 Hz · VAASUS PA328Q and Philips 498P9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56.
- Resolution: ASUS PA328Q leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 498P9 leads (70 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 498P9 leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
ASUS PA328Q
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 498P9
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS PA328Q | Philips 498P9 | |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | Gear score | 56 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 48.8″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 70 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 6 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS PA328Q or Philips 498P9 better?
ASUS PA328Q and Philips 498P9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56. Resolution: ASUS PA328Q leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 498P9 leads (70 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 498P9 leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 498P9 leads (70 Hz vs 60 Hz).