ASUS PA328Q vs Philips 499P9H
ASUS PA328Q
32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSPhilips 499P9H
48.8″ · 5120×1440 · 70 Hz · VAASUS PA328Q and Philips 499P9H are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56.
- Resolution: ASUS PA328Q leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 499P9H leads (70 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 499P9H leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
ASUS PA328Q
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 499P9H
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS PA328Q | Philips 499P9H | |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | Gear score | 56 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 48.8″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 70 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 6 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $990 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS PA328Q or Philips 499P9H better?
ASUS PA328Q and Philips 499P9H are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56. Resolution: ASUS PA328Q leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 499P9H leads (70 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 499P9H leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 499P9H leads (70 Hz vs 60 Hz).