Monitors / Comparison
ASUS PA328Q vs Philips BDM4065UC
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS PA328Q
32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSGood
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time43
VS
Monitor · Philips
Philips BDM4065UC
40″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAGood
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel66
Response time69
Verdict
ASUS PA328Q and Philips BDM4065UC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56.
- Response time: Philips BDM4065UC leads (3 ms vs 6 ms).
Pick this
Philips BDM4065UC
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS PA328Q | Philips BDM4065UC | |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | Gear score | 56 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 40″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 6 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS PA328Q or Philips BDM4065UC better?
ASUS PA328Q and Philips BDM4065UC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56. Response time: Philips BDM4065UC leads (3 ms vs 6 ms).