ASUS PB278QV vs Samsung U28E590D
ASUS PB278QV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSSamsung U28E590D
28″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · TNASUS PB278QV and Samsung U28E590D are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Resolution: Samsung U28E590D leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS PB278QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung U28E590D leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS PB278QV
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung U28E590D
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS PB278QV | Samsung U28E590D | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 28″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS PB278QV or Samsung U28E590D better?
ASUS PB278QV and Samsung U28E590D are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Resolution: Samsung U28E590D leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS PB278QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung U28E590D leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS PB278QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).