Monitors / Comparison
ASUS PB298Q vs Samsung FT400
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS PB298Q
29″ · 2560×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution62
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung FT400
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time60
Verdict
ASUS PB298Q and Samsung FT400 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 46.
- Resolution: ASUS PB298Q leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Response time: Samsung FT400 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
ASUS PB298Q
If you care most about resolution.
Pick this
Samsung FT400
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS PB298Q | Samsung FT400 | |
|---|---|---|
| 46 | Gear score | 46 |
| 29″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS PB298Q or Samsung FT400 better?
ASUS PB298Q and Samsung FT400 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 46. Resolution: ASUS PB298Q leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080). Response time: Samsung FT400 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).