ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV vs BenQ BL3200PT
ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ BL3200PT
32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA248QV and BenQ BL3200PT are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.
- Resolution: BenQ BL3200PT leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV
If you care most about refresh rate.
BenQ BL3200PT
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV | BenQ BL3200PT | |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | Gear score | 49 |
| 24.1″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $169 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV or BenQ BL3200PT better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV and BenQ BL3200PT are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Resolution: BenQ BL3200PT leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200). Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).