ASUS ProArt PQ22UC vs Philips 24M1N3200ZS
ASUS ProArt PQ22UC
21.6″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDPhilips 24M1N3200ZS
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt PQ22UC and Philips 24M1N3200ZS are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 66 and 66.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt PQ22UC leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 24M1N3200ZS leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt PQ22UC leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ProArt PQ22UC
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Philips 24M1N3200ZS
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt PQ22UC | Philips 24M1N3200ZS | |
|---|---|---|
| 66 | Gear score | 66 |
| 21.6″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt PQ22UC or Philips 24M1N3200ZS better?
ASUS ProArt PQ22UC and Philips 24M1N3200ZS are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 66 and 66. Resolution: ASUS ProArt PQ22UC leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 24M1N3200ZS leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt PQ22UC leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 24M1N3200ZS leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).