ASUS ProArt PQ22UC vs VIOTEK GNV27DB
ASUS ProArt PQ22UC
21.6″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDVIOTEK GNV27DB
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · VAASUS ProArt PQ22UC and VIOTEK GNV27DB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 66 and 66.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt PQ22UC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: VIOTEK GNV27DB leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt PQ22UC leads (1 ms vs 6 ms).
ASUS ProArt PQ22UC
If you care most about resolution, response time.
VIOTEK GNV27DB
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt PQ22UC | VIOTEK GNV27DB | |
|---|---|---|
| 66 | Gear score | 66 |
| 21.6″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 6 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt PQ22UC or VIOTEK GNV27DB better?
ASUS ProArt PQ22UC and VIOTEK GNV27DB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 66 and 66. Resolution: ASUS ProArt PQ22UC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: VIOTEK GNV27DB leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt PQ22UC leads (1 ms vs 6 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: VIOTEK GNV27DB leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).