ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG vs Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG
26.5″ · 2560×1440 · 280 Hz · WOLEDCorsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C
34″ · 3440×1440 · 240 Hz · QD-OLEDASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG and Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 91.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG leads (280 Hz vs 240 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG
If you care most about refresh rate.
Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG | Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C | |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Gear score | 91 |
| 26.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 280 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| WOLED | Panel | QD-OLED |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $900 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG or Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C better?
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG and Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 91. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG leads (280 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG leads (280 Hz vs 240 Hz).