Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWG vs Gigabyte M27Q3

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWG

31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 165 Hz · OLED
GEAR SCORE 86.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate68
Resolution100
Panel100
VS
Monitor · Gigabyte

Gigabyte M27Q3

27″ · 2560×1440 · 320 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 86.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate93
Resolution80
Panel80
Verdict

ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWG and Gigabyte M27Q3 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 86.

  • Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWG leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
  • Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q3 leads (320 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Pick this

ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWG

If you care most about resolution.

Pick this

Gigabyte M27Q3

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWGGigabyte M27Q3
86Gear score86
31.5″Screen size27″
3840×2160Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate320 Hz
OLEDPanelIPS

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWG or Gigabyte M27Q3 better?

ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWG and Gigabyte M27Q3 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 86. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWG leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q3 leads (320 Hz vs 165 Hz).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q3 leads (320 Hz vs 165 Hz).