ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP vs LG 32EP950-B
ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP
15.6″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · IPSLG 32EP950-B
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP and LG 32EP950-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 65 and 66.
- Resolution: LG 32EP950-B leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: LG 32EP950-B leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 32EP950-B
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP | LG 32EP950-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 65 | Gear score | 66 |
| 15.6″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 3 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP or LG 32EP950-B better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP and LG 32EP950-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 65 and 66. Resolution: LG 32EP950-B leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: LG 32EP950-B leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).