ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP vs Philips 34B2U5600C/00
ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP
15.6″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · IPSPhilips 34B2U5600C/00
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · VAASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP and Philips 34B2U5600C/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 65 and 65.
- Resolution: Philips 34B2U5600C/00 leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Philips 34B2U5600C/00
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP | Philips 34B2U5600C/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| 65 | Gear score | 65 |
| 15.6″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 3 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $600 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP or Philips 34B2U5600C/00 better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP and Philips 34B2U5600C/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 65 and 65. Resolution: Philips 34B2U5600C/00 leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHP leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).