ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q vs Philips 27M1C5500VL
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNPhilips 27M1C5500VL
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ROG Strix XG248Q and Philips 27M1C5500VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Philips 27M1C5500VL leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Philips 27M1C5500VL
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q | Philips 27M1C5500VL | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $279 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q or Philips 27M1C5500VL better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q and Philips 27M1C5500VL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Philips 27M1C5500VL leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).