ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 310 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS leads (310 Hz vs 240 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS | Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 310 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $229 | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS or Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS leads (310 Hz vs 240 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS leads (310 Hz vs 240 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS ≈ $229, Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 ≈ $700. Current prices vary by store.