ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN vs Philips Evnia 49M2C8900L
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 380 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 49M2C8900L
48.9″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · OLEDASUS ROG Strix XG259QN and Philips Evnia 49M2C8900L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82.
- Resolution: Philips Evnia 49M2C8900L leads (5120×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN leads (380 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips Evnia 49M2C8900L
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN | Philips Evnia 49M2C8900L | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Gear score | 82 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 48.9″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 380 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN or Philips Evnia 49M2C8900L better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN and Philips Evnia 49M2C8900L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82. Resolution: Philips Evnia 49M2C8900L leads (5120×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN leads (380 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN leads (380 Hz vs 144 Hz).