ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q vs LG 38WN95C-W
ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · IPSLG 38WN95C-W
38″ · 3840×1600 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG279Q and LG 38WN95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77.
- Resolution: LG 38WN95C-W leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 38WN95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q | LG 38WN95C-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 77 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 38″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×1600 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,500 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q or LG 38WN95C-W better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q and LG 38WN95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77. Resolution: LG 38WN95C-W leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).