ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q vs Philips 27M2N3201PL
ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M2N3201PL
27″ · 1920×1080 · 260 Hz · Fast IPSASUS ROG Strix XG279Q and Philips 27M2N3201PL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201PL leads (260 Hz vs 170 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27M2N3201PL
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q | Philips 27M2N3201PL | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 77 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 260 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q or Philips 27M2N3201PL better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q and Philips 27M2N3201PL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201PL leads (260 Hz vs 170 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201PL leads (260 Hz vs 170 Hz).