ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q vs Philips Evnia 27M2N5500
ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 27M2N5500
27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG279Q and Philips Evnia 27M2N5500 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77.
- Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2N5500 leads (180 Hz vs 170 Hz).
Philips Evnia 27M2N5500
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q | Philips Evnia 27M2N5500 | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 77 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q or Philips Evnia 27M2N5500 better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q and Philips Evnia 27M2N5500 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77. Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2N5500 leads (180 Hz vs 170 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2N5500 leads (180 Hz vs 170 Hz).