ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition vs Samsung C49G93TSSR
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition
27″ · 2560×1440 · 270 Hz · IPSSamsung C49G93TSSR
49″ · 5120×1440 · 240 Hz · VAASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition and Samsung C49G93TSSR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85.
- Resolution: Samsung C49G93TSSR leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition leads (270 Hz vs 240 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung C49G93TSSR
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition | Samsung C49G93TSSR | |
|---|---|---|
| 85 | Gear score | 85 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 270 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition or Samsung C49G93TSSR better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition and Samsung C49G93TSSR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85. Resolution: Samsung C49G93TSSR leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition leads (270 Hz vs 240 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA Edition leads (270 Hz vs 240 Hz).