ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM vs Philips Evnia 34M2C6500
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM
27″ · 2560×1440 · 270 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 34M2C6500
34″ · 3440×1440 · 175 Hz · OLEDASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM and Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85.
- Resolution: Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM leads (270 Hz vs 175 Hz).
- Response time: Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 leads (0.03 ms vs 0.5 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips Evnia 34M2C6500
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM | Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| 85 | Gear score | 85 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 270 Hz | Refresh rate | 175 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $600 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM or Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM and Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85. Resolution: Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM leads (270 Hz vs 175 Hz). Response time: Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 leads (0.03 ms vs 0.5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM leads (270 Hz vs 175 Hz).