Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS vs Philips 32M2C3500L

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS

27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate72
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
VS
Monitor · Philips

Philips 32M2C3500L

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · Fast VA
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate72
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
Verdict

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS and Philips 32M2C3500L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCSPhilips 32M2C3500L
75Gear score75
27″Screen size31.5″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
180 HzRefresh rate180 Hz
VAPanelFast VA
1 msResponse time1 ms
≈ $278Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS or Philips 32M2C3500L better?

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS and Philips 32M2C3500L are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.

Similar comparisons

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS vs ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCSASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS vs ASUS ROG Strix XG43UQASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS vs ASUS ROG Swift PG329QASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS vs BenQ EX270MASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS vs BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710QPhilips 32M2C3500L vs ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCSPhilips 32M2C3500L vs ASUS ROG Strix XG43UQPhilips 32M2C3500L vs BenQ EX270MPhilips 32M2C3500L vs BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q