Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS vs Philips Evnia 5000 32M2C5501

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS

27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate72
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
VS
Monitor · Philips

Philips Evnia 5000 32M2C5501

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate72
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
Verdict

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS and Philips Evnia 5000 32M2C5501 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCSPhilips Evnia 5000 32M2C5501
75Gear score75
27″Screen size31.5″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
180 HzRefresh rate180 Hz
VAPanelVA
1 msResponse time1 ms
≈ $278Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS or Philips Evnia 5000 32M2C5501 better?

ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS and Philips Evnia 5000 32M2C5501 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.