ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs Philips 27M1N5200PA
ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM
29.5″ · 2560×1080 · 220 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M1N5200PA
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG309CM and Philips 27M1N5200PA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M1N5200PA leads (240 Hz vs 220 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27M1N5200PA
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM | Philips 27M1N5200PA | |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Gear score | 76 |
| 29.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 220 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or Philips 27M1N5200PA better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM and Philips 27M1N5200PA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27M1N5200PA leads (240 Hz vs 220 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M1N5200PA leads (240 Hz vs 220 Hz).