Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM vs Philips Evnia 27M2N5201P

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

29.5″ · 2560×1080 · 220 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 76.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate81
Resolution62
Panel80
Response time90
VS
Monitor · Philips

Philips Evnia 27M2N5201P

27″ · 1920×1080 · 260 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 76.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate88
Resolution55
Panel80
Verdict

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM and Philips Evnia 27M2N5201P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76.

  • Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080).
  • Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2N5201P leads (260 Hz vs 220 Hz).
Pick this

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM

If you care most about resolution.

Pick this

Philips Evnia 27M2N5201P

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CMPhilips Evnia 27M2N5201P
76Gear score76
29.5″Screen size27″
2560×1080Resolution1920×1080
220 HzRefresh rate260 Hz
IPSPanelIPS
1 msResponse time—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM or Philips Evnia 27M2N5201P better?

ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM and Philips Evnia 27M2N5201P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG309CM leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2N5201P leads (260 Hz vs 220 Hz).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2N5201P leads (260 Hz vs 220 Hz).