ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS vs LG 48GQ900-B
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 280 Hz · VALG 48GQ900-B
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · OLEDASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS and LG 48GQ900-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81.
- Resolution: LG 48GQ900-B leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS leads (280 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: LG 48GQ900-B leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 48GQ900-B
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS | LG 48GQ900-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 81 | Gear score | 81 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 47.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 280 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| VA | Panel | OLED |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $2,470 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS or LG 48GQ900-B better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS and LG 48GQ900-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81. Resolution: LG 48GQ900-B leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS leads (280 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: LG 48GQ900-B leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS leads (280 Hz vs 120 Hz).