ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS vs Philips Evnia 27M2N5901A
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 280 Hz · VAPhilips Evnia 27M2N5901A
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS and Philips Evnia 27M2N5901A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81.
- Resolution: Philips Evnia 27M2N5901A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS leads (280 Hz vs 160 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips Evnia 27M2N5901A
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS | Philips Evnia 27M2N5901A | |
|---|---|---|
| 81 | Gear score | 81 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 280 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS or Philips Evnia 27M2N5901A better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS and Philips Evnia 27M2N5901A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 81 and 81. Resolution: Philips Evnia 27M2N5901A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS leads (280 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCMS leads (280 Hz vs 160 Hz).