ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS vs Gigabyte AORUS FI25F
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VAGigabyte AORUS FI25F
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS and Gigabyte AORUS FI25F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS FI25F leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS
If you care most about resolution.
Gigabyte AORUS FI25F
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS | Gigabyte AORUS FI25F | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 75 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $249 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS or Gigabyte AORUS FI25F better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS and Gigabyte AORUS FI25F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS FI25F leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS FI25F leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).