ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS vs MSI MAG 255XFV
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VAMSI MAG 255XFV
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 250 Hz · VAASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS and MSI MAG 255XFV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255XFV leads (250 Hz vs 180 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 255XFV leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 255XFV
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS | MSI MAG 255XFV | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 75 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 250 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| ≈ $249 | Estimated price | ≈ $130 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS or MSI MAG 255XFV better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS and MSI MAG 255XFV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255XFV leads (250 Hz vs 180 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 255XFV leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255XFV leads (250 Hz vs 180 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS ≈ $249, MSI MAG 255XFV ≈ $130. Current prices vary by store.