ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS vs Philips 27M2N3500NF
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VAPhilips 27M2N3500NF
27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS and Philips 27M2N3500NF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (180 Hz vs 170 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS | Philips 27M2N3500NF | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 75 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $249 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS or Philips 27M2N3500NF better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS and Philips 27M2N3500NF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (180 Hz vs 170 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (180 Hz vs 170 Hz).