ASUS ROG Strix XG349C vs INNOCN 32M2V
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C
34.1″ · 3440×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSINNOCN 32M2V
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · Mini LED IPSASUS ROG Strix XG349C and INNOCN 32M2V are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80.
- Resolution: INNOCN 32M2V leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C
If you care most about refresh rate.
INNOCN 32M2V
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG349C | INNOCN 32M2V | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 80 |
| 34.1″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Mini LED IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $650 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG349C or INNOCN 32M2V better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C and INNOCN 32M2V are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80. Resolution: INNOCN 32M2V leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).