ASUS ROG Strix XG349C vs Philips 27M2C5500W
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C
34.1″ · 3440×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M2C5500W
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · VAASUS ROG Strix XG349C and Philips 27M2C5500W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5500W leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27M2C5500W
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG349C | Philips 27M2C5500W | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 80 |
| 34.1″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $650 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG349C or Philips 27M2C5500W better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C and Philips 27M2C5500W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5500W leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M2C5500W leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).