ASUS ROG Strix XG349C vs Philips 32M1N5800A
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C
34.1″ · 3440×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSPhilips 32M1N5800A
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Strix XG349C and Philips 32M1N5800A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80.
- Resolution: Philips 32M1N5800A leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 32M1N5800A
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG349C | Philips 32M1N5800A | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 80 |
| 34.1″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $650 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG349C or Philips 32M1N5800A better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG349C and Philips 32M1N5800A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80. Resolution: Philips 32M1N5800A leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG349C leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).