ASUS ROG Strix XG438Q vs VIOTEK GN32DR
ASUS ROG Strix XG438Q
43″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · VAVIOTEK GN32DR
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · VAASUS ROG Strix XG438Q and VIOTEK GN32DR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG438Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN32DR leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: VIOTEK GN32DR leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG438Q
If you care most about resolution.
VIOTEK GN32DR
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG438Q | VIOTEK GN32DR | |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Gear score | 69 |
| 43″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG438Q or VIOTEK GN32DR better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG438Q and VIOTEK GN32DR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69. Resolution: ASUS ROG Strix XG438Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN32DR leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: VIOTEK GN32DR leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN32DR leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).