ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ vs BenQ EX270QM
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 138 Hz · OLEDBenQ EX270QM
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and BenQ EX270QM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 83.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: BenQ EX270QM leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
BenQ EX270QM
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ | BenQ EX270QM | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 83 |
| 47.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 138 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | IPS |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $400 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ or BenQ EX270QM better?
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and BenQ EX270QM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 83. Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: BenQ EX270QM leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ EX270QM leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz).