ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ vs MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 138 Hz · OLEDMSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED
34″ · 3440×1440 · 175 Hz · OLEDASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 85.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED leads (175 Hz vs 138 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED leads (0.03 ms vs 0.1 ms).
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ | MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 85 |
| 47.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 138 Hz | Refresh rate | 175 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | OLED |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ or MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED better?
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 85. Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED leads (175 Hz vs 138 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED leads (0.03 ms vs 0.1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED leads (175 Hz vs 138 Hz).