ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ vs ViewSonic XG2736-2K
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 138 Hz · OLEDViewSonic XG2736-2K
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and ViewSonic XG2736-2K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2736-2K leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (0.1 ms vs 0.5 ms).
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
ViewSonic XG2736-2K
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ | ViewSonic XG2736-2K | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 84 |
| 47.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 138 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | IPS |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ or ViewSonic XG2736-2K better?
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ and ViewSonic XG2736-2K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84. Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2736-2K leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (0.1 ms vs 0.5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2736-2K leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz).