ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q vs Philips 24M2N3200NF
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q
24″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · TNPhilips 24M2N3200NF
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q and Philips 24M2N3200NF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64.
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q | Philips 24M2N3200NF | |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Gear score | 64 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| TN | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q or Philips 24M2N3200NF better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q and Philips 24M2N3200NF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64. Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG248Q leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).