ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR vs Philips 32M2C5500W
ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 360 Hz · IPSPhilips 32M2C5500W
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · VAASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR and Philips 32M2C5500W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80.
- Resolution: Philips 32M2C5500W leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).
ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 32M2C5500W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR | Philips 32M2C5500W | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 80 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 360 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR or Philips 32M2C5500W better?
ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR and Philips 32M2C5500W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80. Resolution: Philips 32M2C5500W leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).