ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM vs Philips Evnia 27M2N3500PF
ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 27M2N3500PF
27″ · 2560×1440 · 260 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift PG279QM and Philips Evnia 27M2N3500PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 83 and 83.
- Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2N3500PF leads (260 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Philips Evnia 27M2N3500PF
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM | Philips Evnia 27M2N3500PF | |
|---|---|---|
| 83 | Gear score | 83 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 260 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $540 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM or Philips Evnia 27M2N3500PF better?
ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM and Philips Evnia 27M2N3500PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 83 and 83. Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2N3500PF leads (260 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2N3500PF leads (260 Hz vs 240 Hz).