ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ vs Eizo FG2421-BK
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ
27″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSEizo FG2421-BK
23.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 HzASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ and Eizo FG2421-BK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Eizo FG2421-BK leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Eizo FG2421-BK leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ
If you care most about resolution.
Eizo FG2421-BK
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ | Eizo FG2421-BK | |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Gear score | 76 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 23.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | — |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ or Eizo FG2421-BK better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ and Eizo FG2421-BK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Eizo FG2421-BK leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Eizo FG2421-BK leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Eizo FG2421-BK leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).