ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ vs MSI MAG 32CQ6F
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ
27″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 32CQ6F
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VAASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 32CQ6F
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ | MSI MAG 32CQ6F | |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Gear score | 76 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ or MSI MAG 32CQ6F better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).