ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ vs Samsung S27AG50
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ
27″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSSamsung S27AG50
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ and Samsung S27AG50 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Samsung S27AG50 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung S27AG50 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung S27AG50
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ | Samsung S27AG50 | |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Gear score | 76 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $360 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ or Samsung S27AG50 better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ and Samsung S27AG50 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 76. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Samsung S27AG50 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Samsung S27AG50 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung S27AG50 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).