ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W vs BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U
ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W
32″ · 2560×1440 · 175 Hz · IPSBenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W and BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78.
- Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W leads (175 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W | BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U | |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | Gear score | 78 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 175 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $600 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W or BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U better?
ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W and BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78. Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W leads (175 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG329Q-W leads (175 Hz vs 144 Hz).