ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q vs VIOTEK GN35DR
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · IPSVIOTEK GN35DR
35″ · 2560×1080 · 144 Hz · VAASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q and VIOTEK GN35DR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN35DR leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).
- Response time: VIOTEK GN35DR leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
If you care most about resolution.
VIOTEK GN35DR
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q | VIOTEK GN35DR | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 35″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q or VIOTEK GN35DR better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q and VIOTEK GN35DR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN35DR leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz). Response time: VIOTEK GN35DR leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN35DR leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).