ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q vs VIOTEK GN35LD
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · IPSASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q and VIOTEK GN35LD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN35LD leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
If you care most about resolution.
VIOTEK GN35LD
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q | VIOTEK GN35LD | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 35″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q or VIOTEK GN35LD better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q and VIOTEK GN35LD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN35LD leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN35LD leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).