ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q vs Philips 24M2N3200S
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSPhilips 24M2N3200S
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · Fast IPSASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q and Philips 24M2N3200S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 24M2N3200S leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 24M2N3200S
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q | Philips 24M2N3200S | |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Gear score | 69 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| ≈ $1,020 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q or Philips 24M2N3200S better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q and Philips 24M2N3200S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 24M2N3200S leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 24M2N3200S leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).