ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q vs VIOTEK GN32LD
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSVIOTEK GN32LD
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · VAASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q and VIOTEK GN32LD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN32LD leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q
If you care most about resolution.
VIOTEK GN32LD
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q | VIOTEK GN32LD | |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Gear score | 69 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 3 ms |
| ≈ $1,020 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q or VIOTEK GN32LD better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q and VIOTEK GN32LD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN32LD leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN32LD leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).