Monitors / Comparison

ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A vs BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A

24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 310 Hz · Fast IPS
GEAR SCORE 80.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate92
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time98
VS
Monitor · BenQ

BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX

31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · Mini LED IPS
GEAR SCORE 80.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time90
Verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80.

  • Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
  • Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 144 Hz).
  • Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
Pick this

ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A

If you care most about refresh rate, response time.

Pick this

BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX

If you care most about resolution.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5ABenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX
80Gear score80
24.5″Screen size31.5″
1920×1080Resolution3840×2160
310 HzRefresh rate144 Hz
Fast IPSPanelMini LED IPS
0.3 msResponse time1 ms
—Estimated price≈ $1,100

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A or BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX better?

ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 80. Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 144 Hz).